Posts Tagged ‘Copyright’

I like that. It’s right there on the blog. Can’t I just copy it for my blog? Actually, no you can’t. That’s called copyright infringement.

Tuesday, March 15th, 2011

Two historic events have made tremendous changes in the way we disseminate information and communicate. Around 1440 German Johannes Gutenberg perfected the printing press and movable type, which made possible the mass production of books that more than just the elite could have. Almost immediately, the issues of intellectual property ownership, censorship, idea exchange and free speech popped up.

Fast forward a few centuries and those same issues affect the second event–the Internet. We are still struggling with the protection of individual works versus mass information, but this time the media is digital instead of paper.

Juggling the creator’s right to protection and the public’s right to know has always been tricky, but even more so now that anyone who has an Internet connection can express an opinion, either original or based on someone else’s work. That’s where the copyright issue comes in.

Keep in mind that even if you do not see the standard copyright wording (Copyright [date] by [author] All rights reserved) that material, whether words, music, film or any other form of expression, is automatically copyrighted on the Internet, via the international Berne Copyright Convention in 1989.

What can and can’t you do with material you find on the Internet? When you see something on the Internet that you would like to reproduce, ask the author for permission. Most likely you’ll receive a positive reply as long as you describe how you want to us the material. However, you must attribute that material to the original source author.

Use material that you like as inspiration for your own words. CAUTION – Doing a re-write is called a derivative and is still under copyright law, but you can modify an IDEA and write about that in your words.

Searching for a picture to illustrate your blog? Doing a Google search for, say, Pomeranians, and downloading a dog picture without the permission of the poster is a violation of the copyright laws.

There is the fair use issue. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has a good description of fair use, which allows using a small part of someone else’s work if the excerpt is used for a review, as a parody, a comment or a criticism. The EFF is a non-profit group that encourages digital rights and protection on an international basis.

We like Brad Templeton’s readable explanation of copyright issues. Brad is an EFF board member, Internet expert and software developer who also dabbles in photography. All around, a very interesting guy who explains complex issues in an easy-to-understand way.

In this age of instant gratification and easy access, the temptation, or just ignorance of using someone else’s work and passing it off as your own is very real. On the plus side, by honoring copyrights you can exercise your own imagination and write or produce something that is uniquely your own, and you’ll meet interesting people when you do ask for permission use their work.

Some rights reserved–the Creative Commons license may be the way to go

Tuesday, February 15th, 2011

Copyright law has become more of an issue with the universality of the Internet. Designed to protect the originators of intellectual property, the laws can be restrictive. The Creative Commons license for copyrighted material now offers flexibility for both the originator and the potential user. A non-profit organization founded in 2001 with support from the Center for the Public Domain, Creative Commons offers free licenses designed to bridge the gap between a standard copyright and the public domain.

What if you want to share what you created, but still want to control how your material is used? That’s where a Creative Commons license comes in. This type of protection isn’t a substitute for a copyright, but does allow you to determine use restrictions. Instead of “all rights reserved” it’s “some rights reserved.”

For instance, you can allow your work to be shared, copied and distributed, but under your terms. These licenses include:

  • Attribution. With this license, you let others distribute, remix, tweak and build on your work as long as they credit you as the original creator. Attribution Share Alike uses attribution as a basis, but user must credit you and license their new creations under identical terms. Both licenses allow commercial use.
  • The Attribution Non-Commercial license allows others to remix, change and build on your work for non-commercial purposes, but again that new work must acknowledge you. The user doesn’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.
  • Attribution No Derivatives. With this license you allow the user to re-distribute material for commercial and non-commercial use. However, the material may not be changed and must be used as a whole, and credited to you.
  • If you choose a Creative Commons license, there are other sub-category licenses available. You have the freedom to decide how generous you wish to be and still get your work out there for recognition.

In addition to individuals, many large companies have a Creative Commons license of some form for selected sharing.  Google allows CC-search capabilities and allows users to CC license their content on Picasa, Google Knol and documentation at Google Code. Flickr also incorporates CC licensing options while the band Nine Inch Nails used CC to release Grammy nominated Ghosts I-IV as an Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike license. The band offered tiered purchases and eventually landed the #1 paid MP3 Amazon download in 2008.

CC licensing has helped to dissuade online illegal and inappropriate use of creative material, but the best avenue is to obtain a copyright from the United States Copyright Office. The standard copyright will help much more in case legal issues arise.

The Internet introduces a whole new set of problems concerning plagiarism

Saturday, January 15th, 2011

Writing is hard. There’s no doubt about it. It’s also lonely and isolating. Try staring a blank page, and then put some words on it. Your words. Not someone else’s words. If you take the short cut and copy someone else’s words, that’s plagiarism.

Internet plagiarism has become a very serious topic as the amount of information available to anyone anywhere at anytime increases each day. And so plagiarism can be very tempting, given the ease of the Internet.

Many people assume that because some words on the web don’t have a visible copyright, those words are up for grabs. As we learned in the previous YSM blog on copyright laws, that is not necessarily true. All material on the Internet is copyrighted, and therefore owned by someone. Violating that copyright is plagiarism and plagiarism is stealing.

Academics and students have long struggled with plagiarism, how to find it and how to discipline a student when that student plagiarizes. This article in the New York Times does a decent job of discussing academic plagiarism. The comments section is also a good read, as educators challenge students’ ignorance of what Internet plagiarism really is.

When you do write an article, a blog or a paper, you can use someone else’s words, just as long at that information is cited and attributed to the original author. Attribution can also include posting links to your source material as a way to identify the author. However, if you want to use the words from a private blog, it’s best to ask permission first and avoid any misunderstandings.

For more information about plagiarism, what it is and how not to do it, go to plagiarismtoday.com. Then settle in and enjoy using your own words to create your own story.